USMV vs. CNAV
USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USMV is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. Over the past year, USMV returned 4.37% vs 72.64% for CNAV. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USMV charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.
Performance
USMV vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USMV achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.
USMV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
CNAV
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 21.60%
- YTD
- 47.26%
- 6M
- 48.02%
- 1Y
- 72.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMV vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.65% | 7.65% | -2.14% |
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 47.26% | 16.80% | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMV and CNAV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.38 |
The correlation between USMV and CNAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMV vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank
USMV
CNAV
USMV vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMV | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.48 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 5.63 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 24.09 | -21.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMV | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 2.91 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.62 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
USMV vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMV drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, which is greater than CNAV's maximum drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMV and CNAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMV | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.10% | -30.06% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.46% | -12.97% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | 0.00% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -5.42% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 3.02% | -1.09% |
Volatility
USMV vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) is 2.38%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that USMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMV | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 12.28% | -9.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.91% | 21.02% | -15.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.50% | 25.08% | -16.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 27.16% | -14.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 27.16% | -12.65% |
USMV vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
USMV vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison
USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.53% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMV and CNAV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to USMV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMV dropped -33.10% vs CNAV's -30.06%.
On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 4.37% for USMV. On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 4.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for USMV and 1.31% for CNAV.
CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USMV and CNAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer