PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USMC vs. PIEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USMC vs. PIEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than PIEQ's 10.07% return.


USMC

1D
0.44%
1M
0.13%
6M
9.88%
YTD
8.72%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.93%

PIEQ

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.25%
6M
5.01%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.59M$1.39M$4.05M
$7.10M$6.59M$6.39M

USMC vs. PIEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
8.72%14.99%5.37%
PIEQ
Principal International Equity ETF
10.07%38.10%-2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between USMC and PIEQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2024

0.60

The correlation between USMC and PIEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USMC vs. PIEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USMC
USMC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
USMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PIEQ
PIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USMC vs. PIEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USMCPIEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.80

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

10.22

-3.44

USMC vs. PIEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the PIEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMC and PIEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USMC vs. PIEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, which is greater than PIEQ's maximum drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and PIEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USMCPIEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.97%

-15.17%

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-9.53%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.87%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-2.00%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.60%

+0.15%

Volatility

USMC vs. PIEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is 3.47%, while Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that USMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USMCPIEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

4.74%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

15.19%

-5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

17.37%

-4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

17.69%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

17.69%

+0.49%

USMC vs. PIEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PIEQ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

USMC vs. PIEQ - Dividend Comparison

USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than PIEQ's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIEQ
Principal International Equity ETF
1.17%1.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
0.76%0.79%1.04%1.35%1.78%1.53%1.55%2.01%2.28%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


USMC and PIEQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIEQ has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to USMC (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs PIEQ's -15.17%.

On 1-year performance, PIEQ leads with 27.27% vs 20.36% for USMC. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PIEQ has performed better with a 27.27% return vs 20.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for PIEQ.

PIEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.76% for USMC.

USMC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PIEQ is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.48% for PIEQ.

PIEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USMC and PIEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer