PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIEQ vs. BYRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIEQ vs. BYRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ) and Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIEQ achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than BYRE's 11.67% return.


PIEQ

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.59%
YTD
9.31%
6M
10.51%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BYRE

1D
0.81%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
11.67%
6M
12.32%
1Y
9.46%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIEQ vs. BYRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PIEQ
Principal International Equity ETF
9.31%38.10%-2.98%
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
11.67%2.35%-4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PIEQ and BYRE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2024

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIEQ vs. BYRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIEQ
PIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BYRE
BYRE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BYRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIEQ vs. BYRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ) and Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIEQBYREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

1.22

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.26

3.06

+9.20

PIEQ vs. BYRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the BYRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIEQ and BYRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIEQ vs. BYRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIEQ drawdown since its inception was -15.17%, smaller than the maximum BYRE drawdown of -25.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEQ and BYRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEQBYREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.17%

-25.70%

+10.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-7.76%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.91%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.94%

-9.48%

+7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

3.10%

-0.66%

Volatility

PIEQ vs. BYRE - Volatility Comparison

Principal International Equity ETF (PIEQ) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF (BYRE) at 4.35%. This indicates that PIEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BYRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEQBYREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

4.35%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.64%

9.63%

+5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

12.93%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

18.08%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

18.08%

-0.39%

PIEQ vs. BYRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIEQ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BYRE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIEQ vs. BYRE - Dividend Comparison

PIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than BYRE's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BYRE
Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF
2.46%2.71%2.31%2.63%1.86%
PIEQ
Principal International Equity ETF
1.17%1.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIEQ and BYRE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIEQ has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to BYRE (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIEQ dropped -15.17% vs BYRE's -25.70%.

On 1-year performance, PIEQ leads with 29.79% vs 9.46% for BYRE. On fees, PIEQ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, BYRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PIEQ has performed better with a 29.79% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PIEQ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BYRE.

BYRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.17% for PIEQ.

PIEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BYRE is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for PIEQ and 0.65% for BYRE.

PIEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIEQ and BYRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer