USMC vs. IG
USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) and IG (Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USMC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index, while IG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Principal. USMC is passively managed, while IG is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USMC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for IG.
Performance
USMC vs. IG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
USMC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.87%
- 1Y
- 24.67%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IG
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMC vs. IG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 7.35% |
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between USMC and IG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.70 |
USMC vs. IG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USMC
IG
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
USMC
IG
-
Financial Services
USMC
IG
Communication Services
USMC
IG
-
Consumer Defensive
USMC
IG
-
Consumer Cyclical
USMC
IG
-
Healthcare
USMC
IG
-
Industrials
USMC
IG
-
Energy
USMC
IG
-
Basic Materials
USMC
-
IG
-
Real Estate
USMC
-
IG
-
Utilities
USMC
-
IG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USMC vs. IG — Risk / Return Rank
USMC
IG
USMC vs. IG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USMC | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USMC | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.02 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
USMC vs. IG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, which is greater than IG's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and IG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USMC | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -1.75% | -28.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -0.54% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | — | — |
Volatility
USMC vs. IG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USMC | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 4.94% | +6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 4.94% | +11.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 4.94% | +13.31% |
USMC vs. IG - Expense Ratio Comparison
USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IG's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USMC vs. IG - Dividend Comparison
USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than IG's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USMC and IG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for IG.
IG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.74% for USMC.
USMC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.26% for IG.
Find the right allocation for USMC and IG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer