PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IG vs. IGEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IG vs. IGEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IG

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.55%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IGEB

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.77%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IG vs. IGEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IG and IGEB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IG vs. IGEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IG

IGEB
IGEB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IGEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IGEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IG vs. IGEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IG vs. IGEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGIGEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.49

-0.48

Drawdowns

IG vs. IGEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IG drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum IGEB drawdown of -21.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG and IGEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGIGEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-21.13%

+19.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.81%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-4.90%

+4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

Volatility

IG vs. IGEB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGIGEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.94%

4.16%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.94%

6.70%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

6.52%

-1.58%

IG vs. IGEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IG has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than IGEB's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IG vs. IGEB - Dividend Comparison

IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than IGEB's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IG
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF
0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGEB
iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF
5.05%4.92%5.09%4.60%3.64%3.84%3.78%5.61%3.59%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IG and IGEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IGEB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGEB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for IG.

IGEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 0.84% for IG.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for IG and 0.18% for IGEB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IG and IGEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer