IG vs. PSC
IG (Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF) and PSC (Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Principal, while PSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index. IG is actively managed, while PSC is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IG charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for PSC.
Performance
IG vs. PSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSC
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- YTD
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- —
IG vs. PSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | -0.77% |
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 9.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IG and PSC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IG vs. PSC — Risk / Return Rank
IG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSC
IG vs. PSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IG | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IG vs. PSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IG drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum PSC drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG and PSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IG | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -46.69% | +44.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -2.52% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -8.19% | +7.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility
IG vs. PSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IG | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 18.87% | -14.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 20.99% | -16.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.58% | 23.24% | -18.66% |
IG vs. PSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IG has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than PSC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IG vs. PSC - Dividend Comparison
IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than PSC's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.73% | 1.92% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 1.47% | 1.30% | 0.95% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IG and PSC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.
IG has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.53% for PSC.
IG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PSC is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for IG and 0.38% for PSC.
Find the right allocation for IG and PSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer