USMC vs. BCHP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) and BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Principal. USMC is passively managed, while BCHP is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USMC returned 19.26%/yr vs 14.32%/yr for BCHP. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. USMC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for BCHP.

Performance

USMC vs. BCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USMC achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than BCHP's 0.96% return.

USMC

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: 9.88%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 1Y: 20.36%
• 3Y*: 19.26%
• 5Y*: 14.11%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.93%

BCHP

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: 2.74%
• 6M: 2.77%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 1Y: 1.67%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	$1.80M	$1.22M	$1.16M
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF	$7.10M	$6.59M	$6.39M

USMC vs. BCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF	8.72%	14.99%	29.82%	7.73%
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	0.96%	10.20%	20.55%	13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between USMC and BCHP is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.83

The correlation between USMC and BCHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

USMC vs. BCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USMC	BCHP
Technology	32.1%	31.8%
Financial Services	19.5%	23.8%
Communication Services	12.3%	16.8%
Healthcare	9.1%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	14.3%
Industrials	6.6%	9.5%
Energy	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	1.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

USMC vs. BCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USMC

USMC Risk / Return Rank: 59
USMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
USMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
USMC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
USMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
USMC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

BCHP

BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 10
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USMC vs. BCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) and Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USMC	BCHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	-0.06	+1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	0.03	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.00	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	-0.06	+1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	-0.18	+6.96

USMC vs. BCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the BCHP Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USMC and BCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USMC vs. BCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USMC drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, which is greater than BCHP's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USMC and BCHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	USMC	BCHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.97%	-18.56%	-11.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.30%	-18.12%	+7.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.12%	-18.56%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-1.92%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-3.09%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	6.04%	-3.29%

Volatility

USMC vs. BCHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is 3.47%, while Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that USMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USMC	BCHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	5.81%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.64%	14.32%	-4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.60%	17.39%	-4.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.46%	17.07%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.18%	17.07%	+1.11%

USMC vs. BCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

USMC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHP's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

USMC vs. BCHP - Dividend Comparison

USMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.02%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF	0.76%	0.79%	1.04%	1.35%	1.78%	1.53%	1.55%	2.01%	2.28%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USMC and BCHP in my portfolio?

USMC and BCHP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USMC or BCHP?

BCHP has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to USMC (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USMC dropped -29.97% vs BCHP's -18.56%.

Which ETF is better, USMC or BCHP?

On 3-year performance, USMC leads with 19.26% vs 14.32% for BCHP. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USMC or BCHP?

Over the 3-year period, USMC has performed better with a 19.26% return vs 14.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USMC or BCHP?

USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BCHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USMC or BCHP?

USMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.

What is the main difference between USMC and BCHP?

Their fees differ too: 0.12% for USMC and 0.58% for BCHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.