USLUX vs. UNWPX
Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX) and U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX).
USLUX is managed by US Global. It was launched on May 2, 1995. UNWPX is managed by US Global. It was launched on Nov 26, 1985.
Performance
USLUX vs. UNWPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USLUX vs. UNWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USLUX U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund | -10.13% | 17.87% | 14.26% | 23.79% | -23.91% | 25.14% | 20.76% | 13.72% | -8.30% | 19.19% |
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | -41.34% | 136.32% | 2.07% | -16.18% | -32.95% | -13.88% | 70.83% | 22.59% | -31.49% | -3.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USLUX achieves a -10.13% return, which is significantly higher than UNWPX's -41.34% return. Over the past 10 years, USLUX has outperformed UNWPX with an annualized return of 9.10%, while UNWPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return.
USLUX
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -8.54%
- YTD
- -10.13%
- 6M
- -6.32%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
UNWPX
- 1D
- -37.54%
- 1M
- -53.72%
- YTD
- -41.34%
- 6M
- -32.73%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- -6.38%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USLUX vs. UNWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USLUX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than UNWPX's 1.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USLUX vs. UNWPX — Risk / Return Rank
USLUX
UNWPX
USLUX vs. UNWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX) and U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USLUX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.25 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 0.64 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 0.26 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 1.77 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USLUX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.25 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.19 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.05 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.05 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between USLUX and UNWPX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
USLUX vs. UNWPX - Dividend Comparison
USLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, less than UNWPX's 10.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USLUX U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund | 8.77% | 7.88% | 9.94% | 2.71% | 6.40% | 15.37% | 0.12% | 2.31% | 16.18% | 13.87% | 8.35% | 8.01% |
UNWPX U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund | 10.15% | 5.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.74% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 17.45% | 28.55% | 0.33% | 9.84% |
Drawdowns
USLUX vs. UNWPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USLUX drawdown since its inception was -77.61%, smaller than the maximum UNWPX drawdown of -83.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLUX and UNWPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USLUX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.61% | -83.78% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.68% | -53.72% | +38.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.85% | -64.16% | +30.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.51% | -69.19% | +34.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.42% | -66.94% | +54.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.28% | -49.57% | +7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 7.92% | -3.63% |
Volatility
USLUX vs. UNWPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX) is 7.13%, while U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund (UNWPX) has a volatility of 47.77%. This indicates that USLUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USLUX | UNWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 47.77% | -40.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.42% | 57.55% | -44.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.14% | 54.52% | -32.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 34.32% | -13.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 32.29% | -12.81% |