PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USLUX vs. FSAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USLUX vs. FSAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX) and Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USLUX achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than FSAVX's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, USLUX has underperformed FSAVX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while FSAVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


USLUX

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.89%
YTD
-4.45%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
6.10%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
9.86%

FSAVX

1D
-0.90%
1M
2.36%
YTD
-1.30%
6M
-6.69%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USLUX vs. FSAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USLUX
U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund
-4.45%17.87%14.26%23.79%-23.91%25.14%20.76%13.72%-8.30%19.19%
FSAVX
Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio
-1.30%8.01%6.15%32.55%-37.45%28.99%63.22%28.87%-13.78%24.00%

Correlation

The correlation between USLUX and FSAVX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.72

The correlation between USLUX and FSAVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USLUX vs. FSAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USLUX
USLUX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
USLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
USLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FSAVX
FSAVX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FSAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USLUX vs. FSAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX) and Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USLUXFSAVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

0.11

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

0.29

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.04

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.15

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.21

0.37

+0.85

USLUX vs. FSAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USLUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the FSAVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USLUX and FSAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USLUXFSAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

0.11

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.05

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.46

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.39

-0.20

Drawdowns

USLUX vs. FSAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USLUX drawdown since its inception was -77.61%, roughly equal to the maximum FSAVX drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USLUX and FSAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLUXFSAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.61%

-81.27%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.68%

-19.11%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-19.11%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.85%

-41.86%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.51%

-43.28%

+8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-10.92%

+4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.10%

-13.37%

-28.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

7.84%

-2.31%

Volatility

USLUX vs. FSAVX - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) at 6.33%. This indicates that USLUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLUXFSAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

6.33%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

16.42%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

20.48%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

23.75%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

24.05%

-4.37%

USLUX vs. FSAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USLUX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAVX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

USLUX vs. FSAVX - Dividend Comparison

USLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%, more than FSAVX's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAVX
Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio
5.75%0.00%0.85%0.86%2.61%2.58%8.57%4.08%7.97%15.51%7.13%16.06%
USLUX
U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund
8.25%7.88%9.94%2.71%6.40%15.37%0.12%2.31%16.18%13.87%8.35%8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


USLUX and FSAVX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USLUX has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to FSAVX (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USLUX dropped -77.61% vs FSAVX's -81.27%.

USLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USLUX and FSAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer