PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USL vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USL vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USL having a 63.07% return and OILK slightly higher at 64.22%.


USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USL vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between USL and OILK is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.97

The correlation between USL and OILK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

USL vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USL
OILK

Financial Services

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

USL
4.5%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

USL

-

OILK

-

Communication Services

USL

-

OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

USL

-

OILK
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

USL

-

OILK

-

Energy

USL

-

OILK

-

Healthcare

USL

-

OILK

-

Industrials

USL

-

OILK

-

Real Estate

USL

-

OILK

-

Technology

USL

-

OILK

-

Utilities

USL

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USL vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USL vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USLOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.42

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

6.91

+0.11

USL vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USL Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USL and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USLOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.06

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.12

-0.11

Drawdowns

USL vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USL drawdown since its inception was -89.06%, which is greater than OILK's maximum drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USL and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.06%

-83.76%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-17.35%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-23.42%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

-34.69%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.16%

-3.66%

-34.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.46%

-32.61%

-28.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

8.56%

-0.29%

Volatility

USL vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) have volatilities of 10.53% and 10.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.53%

10.44%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

23.26%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.54%

28.75%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.08%

30.12%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.35%

35.97%

-3.62%

USL vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

USL has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

USL vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

USL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, USL and OILK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to OILK (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USL dropped -89.06% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 17.41% for USL. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 17.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for USL and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USL and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer