PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USL vs. KRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USL vs. KRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USL achieves a 63.07% return, which is significantly higher than KRE's 5.35% return. Over the past 10 years, USL has outperformed KRE with an annualized return of 10.91%, while KRE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.80% annualized return.


USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%

KRE

1D
-2.39%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
5.35%
6M
6.27%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
7.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USL vs. KRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
5.35%10.21%18.58%-7.61%-15.08%39.29%-7.43%27.44%-18.81%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between USL and KRE is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.23

The correlation between USL and KRE shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USL vs. KRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USL
KRE

Financial Services

4.5%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

USL
4.5%
KRE
100.0%

Basic Materials

USL

-

KRE

-

Communication Services

USL

-

KRE

-

Consumer Cyclical

USL

-

KRE

-

Consumer Defensive

USL

-

KRE

-

Energy

USL

-

KRE

-

Healthcare

USL

-

KRE

-

Industrials

USL

-

KRE

-

Real Estate

USL

-

KRE

-

Technology

USL

-

KRE

-

Utilities

USL

-

KRE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USL vs. KRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

KRE
KRE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USL vs. KRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USLKREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.18

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.44

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

3.72

+3.30

USL vs. KRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USL Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the KRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USL and KRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USLKREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

0.92

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.06

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.24

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.13

-0.12

Drawdowns

USL vs. KRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USL drawdown since its inception was -89.06%, which is greater than KRE's maximum drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USL and KRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLKREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.06%

-68.54%

-20.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-14.95%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-28.20%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

-52.69%

+18.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

-54.92%

-11.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.16%

-7.27%

-30.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.46%

-21.90%

-39.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

5.75%

+2.52%

Volatility

USL vs. KRE - Volatility Comparison

United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a higher volatility of 10.53% compared to SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) at 6.14%. This indicates that USL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLKREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.53%

6.14%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.33%

15.84%

+7.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.54%

23.37%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.08%

29.98%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.35%

31.92%

+0.43%

USL vs. KRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

USL has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than KRE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

USL vs. KRE - Dividend Comparison

USL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
2.32%2.45%2.59%2.99%2.51%1.97%2.78%2.21%2.48%1.40%1.40%1.80%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USL and KRE have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to KRE (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USL dropped -89.06% vs KRE's -68.54%.

On 10-year performance, USL leads with 10.91% vs 7.80% for KRE. On fees, KRE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KRE has been the lower-risk option at 6.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USL has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KRE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

KRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

USL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while KRE is Financials Equities. USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while KRE tracks S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for USL and 0.35% for KRE.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USL and KRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer