PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRE vs. VFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRE vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRE achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's 5.30% return. Over the past 10 years, KRE has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 9.54%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


KRE

1D
0.21%
1M
1.39%
6M
11.83%
YTD
18.73%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
4.83%

VFH

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.24%
6M
7.40%
YTD
5.30%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
13.43%
ALL TIME*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$961.35M$999.45M$1.05B
$53.46M$73.54M$73.23M

KRE vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
18.73%10.21%18.58%-7.61%-15.08%39.29%-7.43%27.44%-18.81%7.49%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
5.30%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KRE and VFH is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.87

The correlation between KRE and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KRE vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KRE
VFH

Financial Services

100.0%
97.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KRE
100.0%
VFH
97.0%

Basic Materials

KRE

-

VFH

-

Communication Services

KRE

-

VFH
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KRE

-

VFH
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

KRE

-

VFH

-

Energy

KRE

-

VFH

-

Healthcare

KRE

-

VFH
0.1%

Industrials

KRE

-

VFH
0.2%

Real Estate

KRE

-

VFH
0.8%

Technology

KRE

-

VFH
2.0%

Utilities

KRE

-

VFH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRE vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KRE
KRE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KRE vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KREVFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.14

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

0.74

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

1.93

+3.37

KRE vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRE and VFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRE vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRE drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRE and VFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KREVFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.54%

-78.61%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-14.75%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-17.30%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.69%

-25.66%

-27.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.92%

-44.42%

-10.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-1.21%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-18.42%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

5.67%

-0.04%

Volatility

KRE vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.07%. This indicates that KRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KREVFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

4.07%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

11.21%

+4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.91%

15.06%

+7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.63%

19.12%

+10.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.76%

22.48%

+9.28%

KRE vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRE vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

KRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than VFH's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
2.10%2.45%2.59%2.99%2.51%1.97%2.78%2.21%2.48%1.40%1.40%1.80%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.67%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRE and VFH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KRE has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to VFH (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRE dropped -68.54% vs VFH's -78.61%.

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.43% vs 9.54% for KRE. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 9.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KRE.

KRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.67% for VFH.

KRE tracks S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KRE and 0.09% for VFH.

KRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRE and VFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer