KRE vs. VFH
KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KRE tracks the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index while VFH tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KRE returned 9.42%/yr vs 13.46%/yr for VFH. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KRE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
KRE vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRE achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, KRE has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 9.42%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.
KRE
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
VFH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- 9.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
KRE vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 12.38% | 10.21% | 18.58% | -7.61% | -15.08% | 39.29% | -7.43% | 27.44% | -18.81% | 7.49% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -0.69% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRE and VFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.87 |
The correlation between KRE and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KRE vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KRE
VFH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KRE
VFH
Basic Materials
KRE
-
VFH
-
Communication Services
KRE
-
VFH
Consumer Cyclical
KRE
-
VFH
Consumer Defensive
KRE
-
VFH
-
Energy
KRE
-
VFH
-
Healthcare
KRE
-
VFH
Industrials
KRE
-
VFH
Real Estate
KRE
-
VFH
Technology
KRE
-
VFH
Utilities
KRE
-
VFH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRE vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
KRE
VFH
KRE vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 0.67 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | 1.74 | +3.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRE vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRE drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRE and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.54% | -78.61% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -14.75% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.20% | -17.30% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.69% | -25.66% | -27.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.92% | -44.42% | -10.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -3.71% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -18.51% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 5.67% | +0.08% |
Volatility
KRE vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.19%. This indicates that KRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 4.19% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | 11.41% | +4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.33% | 14.98% | +8.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 19.26% | +10.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.93% | 22.56% | +9.37% |
KRE vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRE vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
KRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than VFH's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRE SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF | 2.76% | 2.45% | 2.59% | 2.99% | 2.51% | 1.97% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 2.48% | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.80% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KRE and VFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRE has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VFH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRE dropped -68.54% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.46% vs 9.42% for KRE. On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.46% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KRE.
KRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.47% for VFH.
KRE tracks S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KRE and 0.09% for VFH.
KRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRE and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer