PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USIFX vs. MPGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USIFX vs. MPGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA International Fund (USIFX) and Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USIFX achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than MPGFX's 8.67% return. Over the past 10 years, USIFX has underperformed MPGFX with an annualized return of 9.94%, while MPGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.55% annualized return.


USIFX

1D
0.70%
1M
2.07%
YTD
12.86%
6M
13.23%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
9.94%

MPGFX

1D
1.37%
1M
0.02%
YTD
8.67%
6M
8.62%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
12.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USIFX vs. MPGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USIFX
USAA International Fund
12.86%33.11%4.75%17.47%-15.92%14.83%3.26%22.76%-14.15%28.14%
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
8.67%10.55%19.61%27.70%-21.28%29.42%16.80%28.40%-4.27%16.54%

Correlation

The correlation between USIFX and MPGFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 1988

0.58

The correlation between USIFX and MPGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USIFX vs. MPGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USIFX
USIFX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
USIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
USIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MPGFX
MPGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MPGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MPGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USIFX vs. MPGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA International Fund (USIFX) and Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USIFXMPGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.36

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

9.46

-0.38

USIFX vs. MPGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the MPGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USIFX and MPGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USIFX vs. MPGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USIFX drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, smaller than the maximum MPGFX drawdown of -61.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIFX and MPGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USIFXMPGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.23%

-61.00%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-9.54%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-19.03%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.00%

-25.87%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.76%

-33.08%

-3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-1.00%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-14.69%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.37%

+0.67%

Volatility

USIFX vs. MPGFX - Volatility Comparison

USAA International Fund (USIFX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) at 4.50%. This indicates that USIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USIFXMPGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

4.50%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

10.07%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

12.85%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.35%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

18.12%

-1.17%

USIFX vs. MPGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USIFX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than MPGFX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

USIFX vs. MPGFX - Dividend Comparison

USIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than MPGFX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
4.13%4.48%3.84%2.34%8.80%8.13%8.81%7.39%8.76%9.47%5.84%7.92%
USIFX
USAA International Fund
10.78%12.16%5.44%1.87%2.94%8.74%1.91%25.11%8.50%3.07%1.55%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


USIFX and MPGFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USIFX has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to MPGFX (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USIFX dropped -53.23% vs MPGFX's -61.00%.

USIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USIFX and MPGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer