USEW vs. MTUM
USEW (Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USEW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. USEW is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
USEW vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USEW achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 22.55% return.
USEW
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 22.55%
- 6M
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 31.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.47%
USEW vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USEW Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF | 7.29% | 0.77% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 22.55% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between USEW and MTUM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USEW vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
USEW
MTUM
USEW vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF (USEW) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USEW | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.81 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
USEW vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USEW drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEW and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USEW | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -34.08% | +26.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -6.99% | +5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -6.21% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility
USEW vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USEW | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.96% | 20.03% | -7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.96% | 20.77% | -7.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.96% | 21.12% | -8.16% |
USEW vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
USEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USEW vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
USEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than MTUM's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.64% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
USEW Cambria U.S. Equal Weight ETF | 0.50% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USEW and MTUM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USEW.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.50% for USEW.
USEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for USEW and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for USEW and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer