PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEP vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USEP vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEP achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.


USEP

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.27%
YTD
4.54%
6M
4.43%
1Y
13.63%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*

ENFR

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
24.93%
6M
25.03%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USEP vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September
4.54%11.75%12.39%18.62%-7.98%5.73%7.13%3.68%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
24.93%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between USEP and ENFR is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2019

0.43

The correlation between USEP and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USEP vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USEP
ENFR

Technology

38.4%

-

Financial Services

11.0%
0.1%

Communication Services

10.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Energy

3.2%
98.5%

Utilities

2.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

USEP
38.4%
ENFR

-

Financial Services

USEP
11.0%
ENFR
0.1%

Communication Services

USEP
10.8%
ENFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

USEP
10.0%
ENFR

-

Healthcare

USEP
8.4%
ENFR

-

Industrials

USEP
7.9%
ENFR
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

USEP
4.6%
ENFR

-

Energy

USEP
3.2%
ENFR
98.5%

Utilities

USEP
2.1%
ENFR
1.4%

Real Estate

USEP
1.8%
ENFR

-

Basic Materials

USEP
1.7%
ENFR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USEP vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USEP
USEP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
USEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
USEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
USEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USEP vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USEPENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.32

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.23

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.46

8.24

+9.21

USEP vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USEP and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USEP vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEP drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEP and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USEPENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-68.28%

+54.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-8.64%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.72%

-15.58%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.84%

-20.29%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-4.71%

+4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-15.94%

+14.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

3.38%

-2.60%

Volatility

USEP vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) is 1.33%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that USEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USEPENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

5.69%

-4.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

11.60%

-7.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.38%

14.86%

-9.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

19.25%

-11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.04%

24.68%

-16.64%

USEP vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

USEP vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

USEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.02%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
USEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USEP and ENFR have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to USEP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USEP dropped -13.37% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 5-year performance, ENFR leads with 20.07% vs 7.91% for USEP. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, USEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for USEP.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for USEP.

USEP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ENFR is Energy Equities. USEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for USEP and 0.35% for ENFR.

USEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USEP and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer