PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEP vs. FFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USEP vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEP achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.28% return.


USEP

1D
0.03%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.81%
6M
5.48%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

FFTY

1D
3.08%
1M
8.42%
YTD
20.28%
6M
21.99%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
-0.31%
10Y*
7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USEP vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September
4.81%11.75%12.39%18.62%-7.98%5.73%7.13%3.60%
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
20.28%23.38%18.36%12.40%-51.08%11.92%18.20%3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between USEP and FFTY is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2019

0.70

The correlation between USEP and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

USEP vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USEP
FFTY

Technology

36.2%
24.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
13.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
12.1%

Industrials

8.1%
26.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
8.0%

Utilities

2.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
21.6%

Technology

USEP
36.2%
FFTY
24.8%

Financial Services

USEP
11.9%
FFTY
13.1%

Communication Services

USEP
10.9%
FFTY
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

USEP
10.1%
FFTY
4.8%

Healthcare

USEP
8.4%
FFTY
12.1%

Industrials

USEP
8.1%
FFTY
26.6%

Consumer Defensive

USEP
4.9%
FFTY

-

Energy

USEP
3.5%
FFTY
8.0%

Utilities

USEP
2.3%
FFTY
2.1%

Real Estate

USEP
1.9%
FFTY

-

Basic Materials

USEP
1.8%
FFTY
21.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USEP vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USEP
USEP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
USEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
USEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
USEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
USEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USEP vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USEPFFTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

1.16

+1.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.15

1.59

+2.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.21

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

1.80

+2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.87

4.77

+15.10

USEP vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USEP and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USEPFFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.16

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

-0.01

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.20

+0.81

Drawdowns

USEP vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEP drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEP and FFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USEPFFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-59.46%

+46.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-23.29%

+19.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.72%

-29.60%

+19.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.84%

-59.46%

+47.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.22%

+15.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

-22.38%

+20.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

8.77%

-7.99%

Volatility

USEP vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) is 0.64%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that USEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USEPFFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

9.40%

-8.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.00%

26.22%

-22.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.47%

34.12%

-28.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.42%

29.14%

-21.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.06%

27.42%

-19.36%

USEP vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

USEP vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

USEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
1.12%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
USEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USEP and FFTY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTY has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to USEP (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USEP dropped -13.37% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

On 5-year performance, USEP leads with 8.06% vs -0.31% for FFTY. On fees, USEP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, USEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USEP has performed better with a 8.06% return vs -0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USEP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for USEP.

USEP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. USEP tracks S&P 500 Index, while FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for USEP and 0.80% for FFTY.

USEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USEP and FFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer