PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USEP vs. AIOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USEP vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USEP achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.42% return.


USEP

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.98%
6M
4.61%
YTD
5.51%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*

AIOO

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.23%
YTD
2.42%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USEP vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between USEP and AIOO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.73

The correlation between USEP and AIOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USEP vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USEP
USEP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
USEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
USEP Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
USEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AIOO
AIOO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USEP vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USEPAIOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.48

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

6.90

-3.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.25

19.91

-4.65

USEP vs. AIOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the AIOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USEP and AIOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USEP vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USEP drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USEP and AIOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USEPAIOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-0.74%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-0.74%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.06%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-0.18%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.26%

+0.52%

Volatility

USEP vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September (USEP) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) at 0.70%. This indicates that USEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USEPAIOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.70%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.11%

1.42%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.26%

2.06%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

2.05%

+5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.01%

2.05%

+5.96%

USEP vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

USEP vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison

Neither USEP nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AIOO
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


USEP and AIOO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USEP has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to AIOO (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USEP dropped -13.37% vs AIOO's -0.74%.

On 1-year performance, USEP leads with 11.93% vs 5.09% for AIOO. On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, AIOO has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USEP has performed better with a 11.93% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for USEP.

USEP and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for USEP and 0.64% for AIOO.

AIOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USEP and AIOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer