PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCL vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCL vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCL achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.


USCL

1D
-0.85%
1M
4.29%
YTD
7.04%
6M
6.94%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCL vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCL
Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF
7.04%14.26%27.04%12.71%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-8.05%-1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between USCL and TLT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCL vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCL
USCL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
USCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCL vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCLTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.09

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

0.65

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

1.63

+6.46

USCL vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCL Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCL and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCLTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

0.51

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.26

+1.15

Drawdowns

USCL vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCL drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCLTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-48.35%

+29.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-7.58%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-40.44%

+39.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-13.82%

+11.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.04%

-0.46%

Volatility

USCL vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCLTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.76%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

6.50%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.13%

9.77%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

15.87%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

14.91%

-0.07%

USCL vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USCL vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

USCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%
USCL
Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF
1.07%1.10%1.18%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCL and TLT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USCL has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to TLT (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCL dropped -19.00% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 1-year performance, USCL leads with 20.82% vs 4.93% for TLT. On fees, USCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USCL has performed better with a 20.82% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.07% for USCL.

USCL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. USCL tracks MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USCL and 0.15% for TLT.

USCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCL and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer