PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCL vs. USCA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCL vs. USCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USCL having a 6.48% return and USCA slightly higher at 6.50%.


USCL

1D
1.06%
1M
0.92%
6M
6.47%
YTD
6.48%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.30%

USCA

1D
1.11%
1M
1.00%
6M
6.45%
YTD
6.50%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.89M$14.00M$5.61M
$6.10K$67.08K$1.69M

USCL vs. USCA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCL
iShares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF
6.48%14.26%27.04%12.71%
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
6.50%14.24%27.24%13.51%

Correlation

The correlation between USCL and USCA is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023

0.99

The correlation between USCL and USCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCL vs. USCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCL
USCA

Technology

40.9%
40.9%

Communication Services

11.5%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.2%

Healthcare

9.8%
9.8%

Financial Services

9.4%
9.4%

Industrials

7.2%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
4.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Utilities

1.8%
1.8%

Energy

1.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.6%

Technology

USCL
40.9%
USCA
40.9%

Communication Services

USCL
11.5%
USCA
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

USCL
10.2%
USCA
10.2%

Healthcare

USCL
9.8%
USCA
9.8%

Financial Services

USCL
9.4%
USCA
9.4%

Industrials

USCL
7.2%
USCA
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

USCL
4.1%
USCA
4.1%

Real Estate

USCL
1.8%
USCA
1.8%

Utilities

USCL
1.8%
USCA
1.8%

Energy

USCL
1.8%
USCA
1.8%

Basic Materials

USCL
1.6%
USCA
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCL vs. USCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USCL
USCL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
USCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

USCA
USCA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USCL vs. USCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USCLUSCADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.28

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

4.70

-0.05

USCL vs. USCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the USCA Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCL and USCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCL vs. USCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCL drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, roughly equal to the maximum USCA drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL and USCA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCLUSCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-19.14%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-10.25%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-19.14%

+0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.33%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-2.17%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.78%

0.00%

Volatility

USCL vs. USCA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCLUSCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.75%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

10.14%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

13.02%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

14.77%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.85%

14.77%

+0.08%

USCL vs. USCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than USCA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USCL vs. USCA - Dividend Comparison

USCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than USCA's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
1.12%1.14%1.22%1.15%
USCL
iShares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF
1.10%1.10%1.18%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, USCL and USCA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USCA has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to USCL (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCL dropped -19.00% vs USCA's -19.14%.

On 3-year performance, USCA leads with 17.57% vs 17.50% for USCL. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USCA has performed better with a 17.57% return vs 17.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USCL.

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 1.10% for USCL.

USCL tracks MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index, while USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for USCL and 0.07% for USCA.

USCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCL and USCA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer