PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCI vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCI vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCI achieves a 30.16% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 61.37% return.


USCI

1D
0.05%
1M
9.30%
6M
19.52%
YTD
30.16%
1Y
35.83%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
19.95%
10Y*
9.20%
ALL TIME*
4.50%

FLKR

1D
-2.28%
1M
-15.74%
6M
29.07%
YTD
61.37%
1Y
117.49%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.49M$47.84M$51.57M
$1.01M$1.13M$1.88M

USCI vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
30.16%17.63%17.24%0.00%29.47%33.07%-11.47%-1.68%-11.76%2.83%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
61.37%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between USCI and FLKR is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between USCI and FLKR has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCI vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USCI
USCI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
USCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCI Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
USCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USCI vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USCIFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.46

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

12.27

-1.98

USCI vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCI and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCI vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCI drawdown since its inception was -66.41%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCI and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCIFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.41%

-50.06%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-34.17%

+22.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.01%

-34.17%

+22.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

-47.97%

+29.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-28.42%

+26.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.27%

-21.96%

-7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

9.61%

-6.11%

Volatility

USCI vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) is 5.30%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 21.39%. This indicates that USCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCIFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

21.39%

-16.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

50.33%

-36.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

53.42%

-36.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

32.16%

-13.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

29.79%

-13.88%

USCI vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCI has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCI vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

USCI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
2.86%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%
USCI
United States Commodity Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCI and FLKR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (21.39%) compared to USCI (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCI dropped -66.41% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, USCI leads with 19.95% vs 14.07% for FLKR. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, USCI has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USCI has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 14.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.00% for USCI.

USCI is categorized as Commodities, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. USCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: USCF and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for USCI and 0.09% for FLKR.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCI and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer