USCA vs. VTI
USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USCA tracks the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCA returned 20.91%/yr vs 22.37%/yr for VTI. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
USCA vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.72% return.
USCA
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
USCA vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF | 7.54% | 14.24% | 27.24% | 19.92% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.72% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 18.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCA and VTI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between USCA and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
USCA vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USCA
VTI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USCA
VTI
Financial Services
USCA
VTI
Communication Services
USCA
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
USCA
VTI
Healthcare
USCA
VTI
Industrials
USCA
VTI
Consumer Defensive
USCA
VTI
Energy
USCA
VTI
Utilities
USCA
VTI
Real Estate
USCA
VTI
Basic Materials
USCA
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USCA vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
USCA
VTI
USCA vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCA | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 3.24 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 14.94 | -6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCA | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.38 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 0.51 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
USCA vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCA | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -55.45% | +36.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.25% | -8.92% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.14% | -19.30% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.26% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -8.03% | +5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 1.93% | +0.65% |
Volatility
USCA vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USCA | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 2.90% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 9.13% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 12.17% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 17.40% | -2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 18.30% | -3.55% |
USCA vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
USCA vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF | 1.08% | 1.14% | 1.22% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, USCA and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTI has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to USCA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 3-year performance, VTI leads with 22.37% vs 20.91% for USCA. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VTI has performed better with a 22.37% return vs 20.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for USCA.
USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.
USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USCA and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer