USCA vs. SNPG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USCA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SNPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCA returned 20.91%/yr vs 25.37%/yr for SNPG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SNPG.

Performance

USCA vs. SNPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than SNPG's 11.36% return.

USCA

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNPG

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 11.36%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 25.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. SNPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	7.54%	14.24%	27.24%	19.92%
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	11.36%	18.22%	33.99%	19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and SNPG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023	0.93

The correlation between USCA and SNPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. SNPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCA	SNPG
Technology	29.4%	36.1%
Financial Services	13.6%	12.8%
Communication Services	12.7%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	9.4%
Healthcare	10.7%	9.6%
Industrials	7.0%	10.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	0.0%
Energy	3.5%	0.0%
Utilities	2.4%	0.0%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.1%

Return for Risk

USCA vs. SNPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 50
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

SNPG

SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 59
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. SNPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCA	SNPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.12	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.02	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	2.27	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	9.43	-1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCA vs. SNPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SNPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and SNPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCA	SNPG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.12	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	1.63	-0.13

Drawdowns

USCA vs. SNPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum SNPG drawdown of -21.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and SNPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	SNPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-21.69%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-13.12%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-21.69%	+2.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	0.00%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-2.53%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	3.15%	-0.57%

Volatility

USCA vs. SNPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is 2.85%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that USCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	SNPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	4.71%	-1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	11.43%	-2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	14.05%	-1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	18.00%	-3.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	18.00%	-3.25%

USCA vs. SNPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SNPG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

USCA vs. SNPG - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SNPG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF	0.46%	0.49%	0.57%	0.95%	0.20%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.08%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and SNPG in my portfolio?

USCA and SNPG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USCA or SNPG?

SNPG has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to USCA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs SNPG's -21.69%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or SNPG?

On 3-year performance, SNPG leads with 25.37% vs 20.91% for USCA. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USCA has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or SNPG?

Over the 3-year period, SNPG has performed better with a 25.37% return vs 20.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or SNPG?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or SNPG?

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.46% for SNPG.

What is the main difference between USCA and SNPG?

USCA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SNPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.15% for SNPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SNPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.