PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCA vs. SELV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCA vs. SELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly higher than SELV's 5.03% return.


USCA

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.13%
6M
6.77%
YTD
7.11%
1Y
15.41%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
10Y*

SELV

1D
2.00%
1M
2.54%
6M
3.27%
YTD
5.03%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
7.11%14.24%27.24%19.92%
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
5.03%12.86%14.71%4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and SELV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between USCA and SELV has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

USCA vs. SELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCA
SELV

Technology

41.9%
21.4%

Communication Services

12.2%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
4.9%

Healthcare

9.0%
17.0%

Financial Services

8.9%
4.8%

Industrials

6.6%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
12.3%

Energy

1.9%
4.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Utilities

1.7%
7.6%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.8%

Technology

USCA
41.9%
SELV
21.4%

Communication Services

USCA
12.2%
SELV
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

USCA
10.5%
SELV
4.9%

Healthcare

USCA
9.0%
SELV
17.0%

Financial Services

USCA
8.9%
SELV
4.8%

Industrials

USCA
6.6%
SELV
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

USCA
4.0%
SELV
12.3%

Energy

USCA
1.9%
SELV
4.3%

Real Estate

USCA
1.8%
SELV
0.1%

Utilities

USCA
1.7%
SELV
7.6%

Basic Materials

USCA
1.5%
SELV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCA vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA
USCA Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SELV
SELV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USCASELVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.89

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

5.03

+0.60

USCA vs. SELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the SELV Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and SELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USCA vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, which is greater than SELV's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and SELV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCASELVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-13.73%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

-5.92%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-8.94%

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

0.00%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-2.37%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.22%

+0.52%

Volatility

USCA vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) is 3.38%, while SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that USCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCASELVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

4.60%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

7.67%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

9.53%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

11.95%

+2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.76%

11.95%

+2.81%

USCA vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USCA vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than SELV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
1.70%1.74%1.77%2.06%1.26%
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
1.11%1.14%1.22%1.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCA and SELV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SELV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to USCA (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs SELV's -13.73%.

On 3-year performance, USCA leads with 18.34% vs 11.58% for SELV. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USCA has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SELV.

SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.11% for USCA.

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.15% for SELV.

USCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCA and SELV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer