USCA vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

USCA (Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USCA is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USCA returned 20.91%/yr vs 13.00%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USCA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

USCA vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCA achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.25% return.

USCA

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 7.54%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSCX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 5.25%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 15.59%
• 3Y*: 13.00%
• 5Y*: 8.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	7.54%	14.24%	27.24%	19.92%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.25%	12.08%	13.27%	11.02%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and PSCX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023	0.90

The correlation between USCA and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USCA	PSCX
Technology	29.4%	33.2%
Financial Services	13.6%	12.5%
Communication Services	12.7%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	10.0%
Healthcare	10.7%	9.6%
Industrials	7.0%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	5.4%
Energy	3.5%	4.2%
Utilities	2.4%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

USCA vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA

USCA Risk / Return Rank: 50
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 86
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	USCA	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.84	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	4.25	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.58	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	3.72	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	19.07	-10.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

USCA vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	USCA	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.84	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	1.28	+0.22

Drawdowns

USCA vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USCA	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.14%	-10.20%	-8.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.25%	-4.20%	-6.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.14%	-9.61%	-9.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-10.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	0.00%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-1.86%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	0.82%	+1.76%

Volatility

USCA vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.86%. This indicates that USCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USCA	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.85%	0.86%	+1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	4.21%	+4.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.08%	5.52%	+6.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	7.07%	+7.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	6.96%	+7.79%

USCA vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

USCA vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USCA Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF	1.08%	1.14%	1.22%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USCA and PSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, USCA and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, USCA or PSCX?

USCA has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to PSCX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, USCA or PSCX?

On 3-year performance, USCA leads with 20.91% vs 13.00% for PSCX. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USCA or PSCX?

Over the 3-year period, USCA has performed better with a 20.91% return vs 13.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USCA or PSCX?

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USCA or PSCX?

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between USCA and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.75% for PSCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.