USB vs. BBGSX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

USB (U.S. Bancorp) is a stock, while BBGSX (Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Bridge Builder. Over the past 10 years, USB returned 7.51%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for BBGSX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

USB vs. BBGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USB achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than BBGSX's 8.41% return. Over the past 10 years, USB has underperformed BBGSX with an annualized return of 7.51%, while BBGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.

USB

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: 10.96%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 12.55%
• 1Y: 42.92%
• 3Y*: 27.50%
• 5Y*: 4.36%
• 10Y*: 7.51%

BBGSX

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: 4.07%
• YTD: 8.41%
• 6M: -0.45%
• 1Y: 11.91%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 2.58%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USB vs. BBGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USB U.S. Bancorp	11.60%	16.48%	15.62%	4.79%	-19.13%	24.32%	-17.85%	33.62%	-12.36%	6.61%
BBGSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.41%	0.99%	14.47%	20.98%	-29.84%	16.57%	34.41%	29.01%	-2.18%	21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between USB and BBGSX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.51

The correlation between USB and BBGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USB vs. BBGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USB

USB Risk / Return Rank: 83
USB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
USB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
USB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
USB Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
USB Martin Ratio Rank: 80

BBGSX

BBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 10
BBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USB vs. BBGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Bancorp (USB) and Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USB	BBGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	0.57	+1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	0.91	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.11	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	0.63	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.02	1.87	+4.14

USB vs. BBGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USB Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the BBGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USB and BBGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USB vs. BBGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USB drawdown since its inception was -76.08%, which is greater than BBGSX's maximum drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USB and BBGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USB	BBGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.08%	-37.95%	-38.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.21%	-16.72%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.63%	-26.11%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.13%	-37.95%	-14.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.13%	-37.95%	-14.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-2.21%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.63%	-9.54%	-6.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.53%	5.53%	+1.00%

Volatility

USB vs. BBGSX - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Bancorp (USB) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) at 6.83%. This indicates that USB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USB	BBGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.25%	6.83%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.61%	14.80%	+1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.27%	18.45%	+3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.82%	21.81%	+8.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.31%	21.02%	+9.29%

Dividends

USB vs. BBGSX - Dividend Comparison

USB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while BBGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBGSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.58%	0.32%	0.19%	18.00%	12.59%	4.07%	6.12%	1.09%	0.36%	0.00%
USB U.S. Bancorp	3.50%	3.82%	4.14%	4.46%	4.31%	3.13%	3.61%	2.66%	2.93%	2.16%	2.08%	2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USB and BBGSX in my portfolio?

USB and BBGSX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USB or BBGSX?

USB has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to BBGSX (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USB dropped -76.08% vs BBGSX's -37.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.