PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAGX vs. UUSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAGX vs. UUSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (UUSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than UUSTX's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, USAGX has outperformed UUSTX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while UUSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


USAGX

1D
1.44%
1M
1.83%
YTD
0.85%
6M
7.09%
1Y
61.13%
3Y*
40.75%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.25%

UUSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5.56%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAGX vs. UUSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.85%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%-12.26%9.65%
UUSTX
USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund
1.49%5.25%6.20%5.57%-0.69%0.78%3.00%4.37%1.58%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between USAGX and UUSTX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2010

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAGX vs. UUSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

UUSTX
UUSTX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
UUSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
UUSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAGX vs. UUSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (UUSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USAGXUUSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

3.08

-1.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

7.84

-5.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

38.33

-33.13

USAGX vs. UUSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the UUSTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAGX and UUSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USAGXUUSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

3.17

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

2.35

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

1.98

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.82

-1.64

Drawdowns

USAGX vs. UUSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than UUSTX's maximum drawdown of -7.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and UUSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAGXUUSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-7.34%

-73.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

-0.59%

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.12%

-0.59%

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.72%

-2.53%

-43.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.03%

-7.34%

-43.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.52%

0.00%

-24.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.08%

-0.27%

-42.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.60%

0.12%

+11.48%

Volatility

USAGX vs. UUSTX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a higher volatility of 14.19% compared to USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund (UUSTX) at 0.40%. This indicates that USAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAGXUUSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.19%

0.40%

+13.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.26%

1.04%

+34.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.95%

1.47%

+41.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.87%

1.51%

+31.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.68%

1.50%

+31.18%

USAGX vs. UUSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than UUSTX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAGX vs. UUSTX - Dividend Comparison

USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than UUSTX's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.24%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%0.00%
UUSTX
USAA Ultra Short-Term Bond Fund
4.53%4.81%5.30%3.87%2.01%0.87%2.10%2.66%2.38%1.60%1.31%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAGX and UUSTX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAGX has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to UUSTX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAGX dropped -80.89% vs UUSTX's -7.34%.

UUSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAGX and UUSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer