USAGX vs. USNQX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX).
USAGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 14, 1984. USNQX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Oct 27, 2000.
Performance
USAGX vs. USNQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USAGX vs. USNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | 6.26% | 156.06% | 10.76% | 6.73% | -11.80% | -10.14% | 25.85% | 42.97% | -12.26% | 9.65% |
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | -5.93% | 20.52% | 25.42% | 54.46% | -32.71% | 26.82% | 48.31% | 38.86% | -0.43% | 32.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly higher than USNQX's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, USAGX has underperformed USNQX with an annualized return of 16.40%, while USNQX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.56% annualized return.
USAGX
- 1D
- 6.75%
- 1M
- -20.36%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 96.22%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- 22.40%
- 10Y*
- 16.40%
USNQX
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USAGX vs. USNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than USNQX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USAGX vs. USNQX — Risk / Return Rank
USAGX
USNQX
USAGX vs. USNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USAGX | USNQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 1.04 | +1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 1.62 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.23 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 1.84 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 6.82 | +5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USAGX | USNQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.04 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.55 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.82 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.33 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between USAGX and USNQX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
USAGX vs. USNQX - Dividend Comparison
USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than USNQX's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | 0.23% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 2.45% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.20% | 0.00% |
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund | 3.21% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.60% | 4.13% | 4.48% | 1.53% | 0.88% | 0.69% | 1.97% | 0.50% | 2.73% |
Drawdowns
USAGX vs. USNQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than USNQX's maximum drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and USNQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USAGX | USNQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.89% | -76.24% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -12.72% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.72% | -36.95% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | -36.95% | -14.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.48% | -9.06% | -11.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.17% | -26.93% | -16.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.19% | 3.44% | +4.75% |
Volatility
USAGX vs. USNQX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) at 6.56%. This indicates that USAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USAGX | USNQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.28% | 6.56% | +10.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.61% | 12.90% | +22.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.15% | 22.75% | +20.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.19% | 22.92% | +9.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 22.61% | +10.19% |