USAGX vs. MNNAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

USAGX (USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund) and MNNAX (Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - USAGX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Victory, while MNNAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Victory. Over the past 10 years, USAGX returned 11.85%/yr vs 15.26%/yr for MNNAX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. USAGX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for MNNAX.

Performance

USAGX vs. MNNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a -5.41% return, which is significantly lower than MNNAX's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, USAGX has underperformed MNNAX with an annualized return of 11.85%, while MNNAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.26% annualized return.

USAGX

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: -5.41%
• 6M: -9.51%
• 1Y: 51.88%
• 3Y*: 40.64%
• 5Y*: 19.10%
• 10Y*: 11.85%

MNNAX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 6M: 13.41%
• 1Y: 34.57%
• 3Y*: 24.43%
• 5Y*: 16.01%
• 10Y*: 15.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAGX vs. MNNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund	-5.41%	156.06%	10.76%	6.73%	-11.80%	-10.14%	25.85%	42.97%	-12.26%	9.65%
MNNAX Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund	14.87%	21.78%	25.59%	24.59%	-19.03%	35.03%	11.18%	28.33%	-14.68%	28.41%

Correlation

The correlation between USAGX and MNNAX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 1996	0.17

Over the past year, USAGX and MNNAX have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

USAGX vs. MNNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAGX

USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

MNNAX

MNNAX Risk / Return Rank: 80
MNNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MNNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
MNNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
MNNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MNNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAGX vs. MNNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USAGX	MNNAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.46	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	3.28	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.43	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	3.68	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.04	16.93	-12.89

USAGX vs. MNNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the MNNAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAGX and MNNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USAGX vs. MNNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, smaller than the maximum MNNAX drawdown of -92.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and MNNAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USAGX	MNNAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.89%	-92.93%	+12.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.13%	-9.72%	-26.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.13%	-19.06%	-17.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.72%	-30.29%	-15.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.03%	-38.01%	-13.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.20%	-0.31%	-28.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.06%	-50.65%	+7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.29%	2.11%	+11.18%

Volatility

USAGX vs. MNNAX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) at 4.99%. This indicates that USAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USAGX	MNNAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.09%	4.99%	+11.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.69%	11.54%	+26.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.63%	14.56%	+30.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.31%	20.07%	+13.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.93%	20.35%	+12.58%

USAGX vs. MNNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MNNAX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

USAGX vs. MNNAX - Dividend Comparison

USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than MNNAX's 12.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNNAX Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund	12.52%	14.38%	8.72%	4.65%	15.37%	10.88%	0.07%	2.76%	19.25%	5.28%	0.00%	21.54%
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund	0.25%	0.24%	0.00%	2.45%	0.95%	0.84%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USAGX and MNNAX in my portfolio?

USAGX and MNNAX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USAGX or MNNAX?

USAGX has higher volatility (16.09%) compared to MNNAX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAGX dropped -80.89% vs MNNAX's -92.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.