PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAGX vs. INIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAGX vs. INIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than INIVX's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, USAGX has underperformed INIVX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while INIVX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.


USAGX

1D
1.44%
1M
1.83%
YTD
0.85%
6M
7.09%
1Y
61.13%
3Y*
40.75%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.25%

INIVX

1D
1.30%
1M
2.41%
YTD
7.71%
6M
16.89%
1Y
78.67%
3Y*
48.46%
5Y*
21.66%
10Y*
15.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAGX vs. INIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.85%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%-12.26%9.65%
INIVX
VanEck International Investors Gold Fund
7.71%165.88%14.37%9.67%-13.77%-14.23%40.91%38.15%-16.01%13.06%

Correlation

The correlation between USAGX and INIVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 1984

0.92

The correlation between USAGX and INIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAGX vs. INIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

INIVX
INIVX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
INIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
INIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
INIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
INIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAGX vs. INIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USAGXINIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.65

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

7.36

-2.17

USAGX vs. INIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the INIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAGX and INIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USAGXINIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.75

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.64

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.46

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.26

-0.08

Drawdowns

USAGX vs. INIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, roughly equal to the maximum INIVX drawdown of -78.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and INIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAGXINIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-78.96%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

-29.60%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.12%

-29.60%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.72%

-44.66%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.03%

-51.20%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.52%

-20.95%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.08%

-37.77%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.60%

10.62%

+0.98%

Volatility

USAGX vs. INIVX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) have volatilities of 14.19% and 14.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAGXINIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.19%

14.11%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.26%

37.74%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.95%

44.95%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.87%

34.18%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.68%

33.99%

-1.31%

USAGX vs. INIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than INIVX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAGX vs. INIVX - Dividend Comparison

USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than INIVX's 5.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
INIVX
VanEck International Investors Gold Fund
5.58%6.01%7.45%0.10%0.00%6.40%11.70%3.66%2.87%3.76%6.40%
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.24%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, USAGX and INIVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USAGX has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to INIVX (14.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAGX dropped -80.89% vs INIVX's -78.96%.

INIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAGX and INIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer