PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTY vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URTY vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 46.44% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, URTY has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 7.72%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.


URTY

1D
-4.07%
1M
9.06%
YTD
46.44%
6M
40.44%
1Y
117.82%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
-6.71%
10Y*
7.72%

QLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
21.54%
YTD
42.06%
6M
37.45%
1Y
85.49%
3Y*
50.15%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
36.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTY vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
46.44%9.26%7.38%24.43%-62.81%28.47%-7.72%72.37%-39.59%38.85%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
42.06%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between URTY and QLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.74

The correlation between URTY and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

URTY vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URTY
QLD

Financial Services

25.3%
0.2%

Technology

7.3%
53.8%

Industrials

6.4%
2.8%

Healthcare

6.1%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
12.3%

Energy

2.4%
0.6%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.1%

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
7.7%

Communication Services

0.8%
15.8%

Financial Services

URTY
25.3%
QLD
0.2%

Technology

URTY
7.3%
QLD
53.8%

Industrials

URTY
6.4%
QLD
2.8%

Healthcare

URTY
6.1%
QLD
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

URTY
2.9%
QLD
12.3%

Energy

URTY
2.4%
QLD
0.6%

Real Estate

URTY
2.2%
QLD
0.1%

Basic Materials

URTY
1.7%
QLD
1.1%

Utilities

URTY
1.2%
QLD
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

URTY
0.8%
QLD
7.7%

Communication Services

URTY
0.8%
QLD
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URTY vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTY
URTY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
URTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
URTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTY vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URTYQLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

2.70

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

3.16

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.42

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.96

11.92

+0.04

URTY vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTY and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URTYQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.70

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.58

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.81

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.60

-0.40

Drawdowns

URTY vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and QLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URTYQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-83.13%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.56%

-25.13%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.85%

-42.29%

-23.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.76%

-63.68%

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

-63.68%

-24.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.71%

-0.53%

-39.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-18.17%

-16.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.89%

7.20%

+2.69%

Volatility

URTY vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) has a higher volatility of 17.18% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that URTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URTYQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.18%

8.90%

+8.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.37%

24.08%

+16.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.33%

31.85%

+25.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.43%

44.74%

+22.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.32%

44.56%

+24.76%

URTY vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both URTY and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

URTY vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.12%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
0.64%1.02%1.16%0.55%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.28%0.00%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


URTY and QLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URTY has higher volatility (17.18%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTY dropped -88.09% vs QLD's -83.13%.

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 7.72% for URTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URTY and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

URTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

URTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTY and QLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer