URTY vs. FNGU

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

URTY (ProShares UltraPro Russell2000) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - URTY tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%) while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URTY returned 100.50% vs 11.04% for FNGU. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URTY charges 0.95%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

URTY vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 57.52% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's 10.29% return.

URTY

• 1D: 4.30%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 30.87%
• YTD: 57.52%
• 1Y: 100.50%
• 3Y*: 23.03%
• 5Y*: -2.76%
• 10Y*: 7.34%
• ALL TIME*: 14.17%

FNGU

• 1D: 2.99%
• 1M: -5.11%
• 6M: 29.10%
• YTD: 10.29%
• 1Y: 11.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTY vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000	57.52%	4.04%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	10.29%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between URTY and FNGU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.56

The correlation between URTY and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

URTY vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URTY	FNGU
Healthcare	20.2%	-
Financial Services	17.7%	-
Technology	14.8%	60.6%
Industrials	14.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	9.6%
Real Estate	6.7%	-
Energy	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.4%	-
Utilities	2.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	-
Communication Services	2.2%	29.8%

Return for Risk

URTY vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTY

URTY Risk / Return Rank: 71
URTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
URTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
URTY Omega Ratio Rank: 59
URTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
URTY Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 15
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTY vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URTY	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	0.17	+1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	0.69	+1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.08	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	0.19	+2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.12	0.42	+9.70

URTY vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTY and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URTY vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	URTY	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.09%	-61.30%	-26.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.56%	-59.55%	+26.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.15%	-22.93%	-12.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-22.44%	-12.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.96%	26.14%	-16.18%

Volatility

URTY vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) is 10.20%, while MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a volatility of 18.17%. This indicates that URTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URTY	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.20%	18.17%	-7.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.55%	53.37%	-10.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.98%	64.82%	-6.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.34%	79.79%	-12.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.23%	79.79%	-10.56%

URTY vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

URTY vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000	0.75%	1.02%	1.16%	0.55%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	0.28%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URTY and FNGU in my portfolio?

URTY and FNGU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URTY or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (18.17%) compared to URTY (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTY dropped -88.09% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, URTY or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, URTY leads with 100.50% vs 11.04% for FNGU. On fees, URTY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, URTY has been the lower-risk option at 10.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URTY or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, URTY has performed better with a 100.50% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URTY or FNGU?

URTY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URTY or FNGU?

URTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between URTY and FNGU?

URTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URTY and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.