PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
URNM vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

URNM vs. VTI

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URNM is a Uranium fund tracking the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, URNM returned 12.61%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for VTI. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

URNM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 9.62% return.

URNM

1D
0.53%
1M
-9.26%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
—

VTI

1D
0.57%
1M
1.00%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.69%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF		-0.56%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%78.32%68.36%4.05%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		9.62%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and VTI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.49

URNM vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
URNM
VTI

Energy

97.7%
3.8%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.0%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Healthcare

-

9.1%

Industrials

-

9.5%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

33.3%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Energy

URNM
97.7%
VTI
3.8%

Basic Materials

URNM
2.3%
VTI
2.0%

Communication Services

URNM

-

VTI
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

URNM

-

VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

URNM

-

VTI
4.7%

Financial Services

URNM

-

VTI
11.9%

Healthcare

URNM

-

VTI
9.1%

Industrials

URNM

-

VTI
9.5%

Real Estate

URNM

-

VTI
2.4%

Technology

URNM

-

VTI
33.3%

Utilities

URNM

-

VTI
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Often compared with URNM:
URNM vs. URAURNM vs. NLRURNM vs. URNJURNM vs. NUKZURNM vs. URNP.LURNM vs. URANURNM vs. LEU
Often compared with VTI:
VTI vs. VOOVTI vs. VXUSVTI vs. SPYVTI vs. VTVTI vs. SCHDVTI vs. FZROXVTI vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

URNM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

URNMVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.60
1.97

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.18
2.67

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

2.79

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

12.52

-10.52

URNM vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNM Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNM and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URNM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and VTI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

URNMVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.78%

-55.45%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.72%

-8.92%

-29.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.78%

-19.30%

-31.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.78%

-25.36%

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.00%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.02%

-2.14%

-32.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.09%

-8.02%

-10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.78%

1.99%

+13.79%

Volatility

URNM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 17.40% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.50%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

URNMVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.40%

4.50%

+12.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.84%

9.82%

+32.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.48%

12.64%

+39.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.58%

17.47%

+31.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.04%

18.33%

+28.71%

URNM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

URNM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than VTI's 1.03% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF		3.19%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF		1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

URNM and VTI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URNM has higher volatility (17.40%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNM dropped -50.78% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 12.61% vs 12.20% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

URNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.

URNM is categorized as Uranium, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNM and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNM and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer