URNM vs. RBIL

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URNM is a Uranium fund tracking the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URNM returned 20.64% vs 4.20% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. URNM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

URNM vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.66% return.

URNM

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: -2.36%
• 6M: -15.92%
• YTD: -2.91%
• 1Y: 20.64%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: 16.09%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 2.48%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNM vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	-2.91%	57.33%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.66%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and RBIL is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

URNM vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNM

URNM Risk / Return Rank: 18
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 19
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 16

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNM vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URNM	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	4.54	-4.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	7.04	-6.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	2.20	-1.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	7.57	-7.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.22	32.59	-31.37

URNM vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNM Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNM and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URNM vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	URNM	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.78%	-0.56%	-50.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.67%	-0.56%	-39.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.55%	-0.17%	-36.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-0.08%	-18.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.42%	0.13%	+18.29%

Volatility

URNM vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.33%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URNM	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	0.33%	+11.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.67%	0.86%	+39.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.38%	0.94%	+51.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.55%	1.06%	+47.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.94%	1.06%	+45.88%

URNM vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

URNM vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than RBIL's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.37%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF	3.27%	3.18%	3.18%	3.63%	0.00%	6.70%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URNM and RBIL in my portfolio?

URNM and RBIL have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URNM or RBIL?

URNM has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to RBIL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNM dropped -50.78% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

Which ETF is better, URNM or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, URNM leads with 20.64% vs 4.20% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URNM or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, URNM has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URNM or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URNM or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 3.27% for URNM.

What is the main difference between URNM and RBIL?

URNM is categorized as Uranium, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNM and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.