PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNM vs. METL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNM vs. METL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than METL's 5.42% return.


URNM

1D
-0.87%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
1.46%
6M
-1.45%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*

METL

1D
-4.31%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
5.42%
6M
3.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNM vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
1.46%5.23%
METL
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
5.42%28.19%

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and METL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNM vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

METL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNM vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URNMMETLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

URNM vs. METL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URNM vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and METL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNMMETLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.78%

-27.39%

-23.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.69%

-20.07%

-13.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.14%

-8.64%

-9.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.54%

Volatility

URNM vs. METL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNMMETLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.32%

45.01%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.56%

45.01%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.03%

45.01%

+2.02%

URNM vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

URNM vs. METL - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than METL's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
METL
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
0.94%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
3.13%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


URNM and METL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, URNM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

URNM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

URNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.94% for METL.

URNM is categorized as Uranium, while METL is Natural Resources. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNM and 0.89% for METL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNM and METL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer