URNM vs. HTEC
URNM (NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF) and HTEC (ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URNM is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index, while HTEC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, URNM returned 15.43%/yr vs -4.15%/yr for HTEC. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HTEC.
Performance
URNM vs. HTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than HTEC's 0.85% return.
URNM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 4.99%
- 1Y
- 49.43%
- 3Y*
- 26.12%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- —
HTEC
- 1D
- 3.92%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.72%
- 5Y*
- -4.15%
- 10Y*
- —
URNM vs. HTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 11.22% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 3.70% |
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.85% | 23.91% | 2.68% | -2.94% | -33.72% | -0.28% | 65.01% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between URNM and HTEC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.39 |
The correlation between URNM and HTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
URNM vs. HTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
URNM
HTEC
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
URNM
HTEC
Basic Materials
URNM
HTEC
-
Communication Services
URNM
-
HTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
URNM
-
HTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
URNM
-
HTEC
-
Financial Services
URNM
-
HTEC
Healthcare
URNM
-
HTEC
Industrials
URNM
-
HTEC
Real Estate
URNM
-
HTEC
-
Technology
URNM
-
HTEC
Utilities
URNM
-
HTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URNM vs. HTEC — Risk / Return Rank
URNM
HTEC
URNM vs. HTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URNM | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.90 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 4.70 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URNM | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.50 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | -0.17 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.23 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
URNM vs. HTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, smaller than the maximum HTEC drawdown of -57.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and HTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNM | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.78% | -57.53% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.04% | -16.31% | -15.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.78% | -28.67% | -22.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.78% | -56.10% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.31% | -30.63% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -28.99% | +10.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.81% | 6.58% | +8.23% |
Volatility
URNM vs. HTEC - Volatility Comparison
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 16.06% compared to ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) at 6.89%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URNM | HTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.06% | 6.89% | +9.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.27% | 15.37% | +24.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.44% | 20.66% | +30.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.29% | 24.45% | +23.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.89% | 25.50% | +21.39% |
URNM vs. HTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HTEC's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
URNM vs. HTEC - Dividend Comparison
URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than HTEC's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTEC ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF | 0.97% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.86% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URNM and HTEC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNM has higher volatility (16.06%) compared to HTEC (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNM dropped -50.78% vs HTEC's -57.53%.
On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 15.43% vs -4.15% for HTEC. On fees, HTEC is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 15.43% return vs -4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTEC is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.
URNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.97% for HTEC.
URNM is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while HTEC is Health & Biotech Equities. URNM tracks North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index, while HTEC tracks ROBO Global® Healthcare Technology and Innovation Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNM and 0.68% for HTEC.
HTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URNM and HTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer