PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNM vs. DNN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNM vs. DNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a -11.51% return, which is significantly lower than DNN's 5.64% return.


URNM

1D
-1.78%
1M
-8.06%
6M
-34.68%
YTD
-11.51%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.97%

DNN

1D
-3.77%
1M
-12.19%
6M
-29.04%
YTD
5.64%
1Y
37.75%
3Y*
29.97%
5Y*
20.63%
10Y*
18.38%
ALL TIME*
-5.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$65.08M$73.42M$78.76M
$16.15M$21.14M$35.55M

URNM vs. DNN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
-11.51%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%78.32%68.36%4.05%
DNN
Denison Mines Corp
5.64%47.78%1.69%53.91%-16.06%111.75%54.05%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and DNN is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.82

The correlation between URNM and DNN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNM vs. DNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DNN
DNN Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

URNM vs. DNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URNMDNNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.14

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

0.93

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

2.06

-1.52

URNM vs. DNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNM Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the DNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNM and DNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URNM vs. DNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, smaller than the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and DNN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNMDNNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.78%

-98.96%

+48.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

-38.44%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.78%

-52.48%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.78%

-55.66%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.17%

-85.43%

+43.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-85.04%

+66.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.85%

17.40%

+3.45%

Volatility

URNM vs. DNN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) is 13.67%, while Denison Mines Corp (DNN) has a volatility of 19.39%. This indicates that URNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNMDNNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.67%

19.39%

-5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.86%

45.38%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.26%

61.39%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.65%

63.15%

-14.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.95%

64.50%

-17.55%

Dividends

URNM vs. DNN - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while DNN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DNN
Denison Mines Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
3.59%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, URNM and DNN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DNN has higher volatility (19.39%) compared to URNM (13.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNM dropped -50.78% vs DNN's -98.96%.

DNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNM and DNN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer