DNN vs. LEU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU).

Performance

DNN vs. LEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DNN vs. LEU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DNN Denison Mines Corp	32.71%	47.78%	1.69%	53.91%	-16.06%	111.75%	54.05%	-9.48%	-15.64%	6.86%
LEU Centrus Energy Corp.	-28.49%	264.45%	22.42%	67.52%	-34.92%	115.78%	236.19%	307.10%	-57.86%	-37.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DNN : $3.18B LEU : $3.91B
EPS DNN : -$0.24 LEU : $3.92
PS Ratio DNN : 646.45 LEU : 7.69
PB Ratio DNN : 8.65 LEU : 5.11
Total Revenue (TTM) DNN : $4.92M LEU : $448.70M
Gross Profit (TTM) DNN : -$23.92M LEU : $117.50M
EBITDA (TTM) DNN : -$171.24M LEU : $94.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNN achieves a 32.71% return, which is significantly higher than LEU's -28.49% return. Over the past 10 years, DNN has underperformed LEU with an annualized return of 20.22%, while LEU has yielded a comparatively higher 44.32% annualized return.

DNN

• 1D: 6.97%
• 1M: -15.55%
• YTD: 32.71%
• 6M: 28.36%
• 1Y: 171.54%
• 3Y*: 47.95%
• 5Y*: 24.50%
• 10Y*: 20.22%

LEU

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -14.31%
• YTD: -28.49%
• 6M: -44.02%
• 1Y: 179.04%
• 3Y*: 75.34%
• 5Y*: 48.51%
• 10Y*: 44.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DNN vs. LEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNN

DNN Risk / Return Rank: 93
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LEU

LEU Risk / Return Rank: 85
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 83
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNN vs. LEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DNN	LEU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	1.92	+0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.46	+0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.30	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.61	2.64	+2.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.68	5.57	+10.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DNN vs. LEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNN Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the LEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNN and LEU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DNN	LEU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	1.92	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.57	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	0.54	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	-0.10	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between DNN and LEU is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DNN vs. LEU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNN nor LEU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DNN vs. LEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNN drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, roughly equal to the maximum LEU drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNN and LEU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNN	LEU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.96%	-99.98%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.50%	-61.35%	+31.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.66%	-78.23%	+22.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.90%	-83.84%	+7.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.69%	-97.44%	+15.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.10%	-73.82%	-11.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.55%	29.08%	-18.53%

Volatility

DNN vs. LEU - Volatility Comparison

Denison Mines Corp (DNN) has a higher volatility of 20.08% compared to Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) at 18.99%. This indicates that DNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNN	LEU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.08%	18.99%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.53%	67.98%	-22.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.51%	93.93%	-30.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.41%	85.22%	-20.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.17%	82.31%	-18.14%

Financials