PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URINX vs. TRLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URINX vs. TRLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with URINX having a 5.89% return and TRLAX slightly higher at 5.92%.


URINX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.31%
YTD
5.89%
6M
5.79%
1Y
13.40%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
5.78%

TRLAX

1D
0.74%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.92%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.63%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URINX vs. TRLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.89%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%6.47%8.74%11.72%-3.00%3.40%
TRLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund
5.92%10.92%8.74%12.89%-16.59%10.45%13.48%19.08%-4.95%5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between URINX and TRLAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2017

0.90

The correlation between URINX and TRLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URINX vs. TRLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLAX
TRLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TRLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URINX vs. TRLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URINXTRLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.96

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

13.73

+0.82

URINX vs. TRLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the TRLAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URINX and TRLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URINX vs. TRLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URINX drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum TRLAX drawdown of -23.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URINX and TRLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URINXTRLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-23.82%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-5.70%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.84%

-8.86%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.27%

-22.46%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.21%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-4.55%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.16%

-0.24%

Volatility

URINX vs. TRLAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) is 2.45%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that URINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URINXTRLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

2.92%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.70%

6.19%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.55%

7.45%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

8.88%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.88%

9.76%

-3.88%

URINX vs. TRLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URINX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TRLAX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

URINX vs. TRLAX - Dividend Comparison

URINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, less than TRLAX's 8.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund
8.61%8.08%8.38%6.52%7.29%7.77%7.93%5.80%7.83%2.84%0.00%0.00%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
5.82%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


URINX and TRLAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLAX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to URINX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URINX dropped -15.27% vs TRLAX's -23.82%.

URINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URINX and TRLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer