URINX vs. FATHX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A (FATHX).
URINX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jul 30, 2008. FATHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 6, 2003.
Performance
URINX vs. FATHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
URINX vs. FATHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund | 0.62% | 12.36% | 6.66% | 10.79% | -10.38% | 6.47% | 8.74% | 11.72% | -3.00% | 8.34% |
FATHX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A | -0.62% | 18.40% | 10.45% | 16.36% | -17.73% | 13.68% | 16.19% | 25.46% | -8.02% | 20.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URINX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than FATHX's -0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, URINX has underperformed FATHX with an annualized return of 5.47%, while FATHX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.
URINX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
FATHX
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URINX vs. FATHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
URINX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FATHX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
URINX vs. FATHX — Risk / Return Rank
URINX
FATHX
URINX vs. FATHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A (FATHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URINX | FATHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 1.36 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 1.94 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 1.87 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 8.10 | +2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URINX | FATHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.36 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.49 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 0.70 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.43 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between URINX and FATHX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
URINX vs. FATHX - Dividend Comparison
URINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than FATHX's 7.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund | 6.08% | 6.07% | 4.22% | 3.48% | 6.63% | 6.66% | 3.97% | 6.37% | 6.11% | 5.68% | 3.34% | 4.54% |
FATHX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A | 7.35% | 7.30% | 3.19% | 1.48% | 9.82% | 9.38% | 6.04% | 7.14% | 11.79% | 4.12% | 4.69% | 5.12% |
Drawdowns
URINX vs. FATHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URINX drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum FATHX drawdown of -54.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URINX and FATHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| URINX | FATHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -54.71% | +39.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.41% | -8.71% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.27% | -26.13% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.27% | -29.22% | +13.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -5.56% | +2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -7.30% | +5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 2.01% | -0.99% |
Volatility
URINX vs. FATHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) is 2.61%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class A (FATHX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that URINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FATHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| URINX | FATHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 5.01% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.83% | 7.39% | -3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.07% | 12.08% | -6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 12.32% | -6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 13.63% | -7.84% |