URINX vs. DTDRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URINX (USAA Target Retirement Income Fund) and DTDRX (Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, URINX returned 5.13%/yr vs 11.65%/yr for DTDRX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. URINX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DTDRX.

Performance

URINX vs. DTDRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) and Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URINX achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than DTDRX's 12.39% return.

URINX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 13.71%
• 3Y*: 10.57%
• 5Y*: 5.13%
• 10Y*: 5.79%

DTDRX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 13.11%
• 1Y: 28.08%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 11.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URINX vs. DTDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund	5.93%	12.36%	6.66%	10.79%	-10.38%	6.47%	8.74%
DTDRX Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	12.39%	19.28%	17.13%	21.29%	-15.25%	20.99%	13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between URINX and DTDRX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.89

The correlation between URINX and DTDRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

URINX vs. DTDRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URINX

URINX Risk / Return Rank: 82
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

DTDRX

DTDRX Risk / Return Rank: 83
DTDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DTDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DTDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DTDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DTDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URINX vs. DTDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) and Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URINX	DTDRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.86	-0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.99	4.02	-0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.52	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	3.69	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.40	16.19	-0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URINX vs. DTDRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the DTDRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URINX and DTDRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URINX	DTDRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	2.86	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.80	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.70	+0.45

Drawdowns

URINX vs. DTDRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URINX drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum DTDRX drawdown of -33.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URINX and DTDRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	URINX	DTDRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.27%	-33.33%	+18.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.92%	-8.57%	+4.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.84%	-15.95%	+11.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.27%	-23.47%	+8.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-5.10%	+3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	1.88%	-0.98%

Volatility

URINX vs. DTDRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) is 1.91%, while Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DTDRX) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that URINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URINX	DTDRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.91%	3.10%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.24%	8.68%	-4.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.17%	11.04%	-5.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.29%	14.87%	-8.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.84%	19.17%	-13.33%

URINX vs. DTDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URINX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DTDRX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

URINX vs. DTDRX - Dividend Comparison

URINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than DTDRX's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DTDRX Dimensional 2065 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	1.37%	1.31%	2.07%	1.94%	2.01%	1.53%	2.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund	5.77%	6.07%	4.22%	3.48%	6.63%	6.66%	3.97%	6.37%	6.11%	5.68%	3.34%	4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URINX and DTDRX in my portfolio?

URINX and DTDRX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URINX or DTDRX?

DTDRX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to URINX (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URINX dropped -15.27% vs DTDRX's -33.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.