PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URE vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URE vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return. Over the past 10 years, URE has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 2.80%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.01% annualized return.


URE

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
13.97%
6M
11.99%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
8.96%
5Y*
-4.07%
10Y*
2.80%

SQQQ

1D
0.76%
1M
-26.37%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-42.79%
1Y
-65.16%
3Y*
-56.19%
5Y*
-49.17%
10Y*
-56.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URE vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
13.97%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%-28.06%57.86%-13.80%16.56%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-45.27%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between URE and SQQQ is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.50

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between URE and SQQQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.50 to -0.16, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

URE vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URE
SQQQ

Real Estate

67.2%

-

Financial Services

8.6%
97.1%

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

URE
67.2%
SQQQ

-

Financial Services

URE
8.6%
SQQQ
97.1%

Basic Materials

URE
1.2%
SQQQ

-

Communication Services

URE

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

URE

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

URE

-

SQQQ

-

Energy

URE

-

SQQQ

-

Healthcare

URE

-

SQQQ

-

Industrials

URE

-

SQQQ

-

Technology

URE

-

SQQQ

-

Utilities

URE

-

SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URE vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URE vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URESQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.72

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

-0.99

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

-1.82

+3.02

URE vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URE and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URESQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

-1.37

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

-0.74

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

-0.85

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

-0.88

+0.81

Drawdowns

URE vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URESQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-100.00%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.50%

-65.95%

+49.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.77%

-92.38%

+58.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.66%

-97.23%

+33.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

-99.98%

+29.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.68%

-100.00%

+47.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.52%

-92.40%

+27.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

35.73%

-28.90%

Volatility

URE vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) is 7.56%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that URE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URESQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

13.75%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.29%

36.45%

-17.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.73%

47.79%

-21.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.28%

66.64%

-29.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.53%

66.11%

-25.58%

URE vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both URE and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

URE vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than SQQQ's 12.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.48%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%0.00%0.00%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
2.05%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


URE and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to URE (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, URE leads with 2.80% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, URE has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URE has performed better with a 2.80% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URE and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 2.05% for URE.

URE is categorized as REIT, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).

URE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URE and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer