PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URE vs. SCHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URE vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 18.80% return, which is significantly higher than SCHH's 12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, URE has underperformed SCHH with an annualized return of 3.35%, while SCHH has yielded a comparatively higher 4.28% annualized return.


URE

1D
4.23%
1M
0.65%
YTD
18.80%
6M
17.25%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
-3.27%
10Y*
3.35%

SCHH

1D
1.69%
1M
0.69%
YTD
12.96%
6M
12.23%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URE vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
18.80%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%-28.06%57.86%-13.80%16.56%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
12.96%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between URE and SCHH is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011

0.98

The correlation between URE and SCHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

URE vs. SCHH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URE
SCHH

Real Estate

67.2%
98.7%

Financial Services

8.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

URE
67.2%
SCHH
98.7%

Financial Services

URE
8.6%
SCHH
0.1%

Basic Materials

URE
1.2%
SCHH
1.2%

Communication Services

URE

-

SCHH

-

Consumer Cyclical

URE

-

SCHH

-

Consumer Defensive

URE

-

SCHH

-

Energy

URE

-

SCHH

-

Healthcare

URE

-

SCHH

-

Industrials

URE

-

SCHH

-

Technology

URE

-

SCHH

-

Utilities

URE

-

SCHH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URE vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URE vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URESCHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.19

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.70

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

5.34

-3.59

URE vs. SCHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the SCHH Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URE and SCHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URESCHHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.06

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.18

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.20

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.34

-0.40

Drawdowns

URE vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than SCHH's maximum drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and SCHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URESCHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-44.22%

-52.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.50%

-8.28%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.77%

-17.76%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.66%

-33.28%

-30.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

-44.22%

-26.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.67%

-1.55%

-49.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.52%

-9.45%

-55.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

2.63%

+4.20%

Volatility

URE vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) at 4.17%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URESCHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

4.17%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

9.61%

+10.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.04%

13.27%

+13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.33%

18.72%

+18.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.55%

20.97%

+19.58%

URE vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

URE vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison

URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than SCHH's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.77%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
1.97%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, URE and SCHH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URE has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to SCHH (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs SCHH's -44.22%.

On 10-year performance, SCHH leads with 4.28% vs 3.35% for URE. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHH has performed better with a 4.28% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.97% for URE.

URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URE and 0.07% for SCHH.

SCHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URE and SCHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer