PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URAA vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URAA vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAA achieves a -35.10% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -9.16% return.


URAA

1D
-1.48%
1M
-32.62%
6M
-58.05%
YTD
-35.10%
1Y
-28.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMF

1D
0.94%
1M
-6.04%
6M
-10.50%
YTD
-9.16%
1Y
-1.98%
3Y*
-21.11%
5Y*
-33.31%
10Y*
-17.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAA vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
URAA
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares
-35.10%88.33%-25.73%
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
-9.16%-2.94%-23.15%

Correlation

The correlation between URAA and TMF is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URAA vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAA
URAA Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
URAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
URAA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
URAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
URAA Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAA vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URAATMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.01

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

-0.08

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

-0.15

-0.71

URAA vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAA and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URAA vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAA drawdown since its inception was -67.45%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAA and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAATMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.45%

-92.89%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.32%

-26.51%

-40.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.32%

-92.48%

+25.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.97%

-43.95%

+14.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.55%

13.14%

+20.41%

Volatility

URAA vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) has a higher volatility of 19.10% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.35%. This indicates that URAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAATMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.10%

7.35%

+11.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

73.04%

19.77%

+53.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.44%

27.49%

+68.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.13%

46.48%

+42.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.13%

43.70%

+45.43%

URAA vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAA has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

URAA vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

URAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.52%, more than TMF's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.35%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%
URAA
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares
15.52%9.14%4.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


URAA and TMF have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URAA has higher volatility (19.10%) compared to TMF (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAA dropped -67.45% vs TMF's -92.89%.

On 1-year performance, TMF leads with -1.98% vs -28.91% for URAA. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TMF has performed better with a -1.98% return vs -28.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for URAA.

URAA has the higher dividend yield at 15.52%, compared with 4.35% for TMF.

URAA is categorized as Uranium, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. URAA tracks Solactive United States Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF Select Index (200%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.28% for URAA and 1.01% for TMF.

TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URAA and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer