PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URAA vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URAA vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAA achieves a -16.20% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -51.75% return.


URAA

1D
-3.76%
1M
-26.89%
YTD
-16.20%
6M
-23.09%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
-7.88%
1M
47.60%
YTD
-51.75%
6M
-57.71%
1Y
-33.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAA vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between URAA and HOOG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.51

The correlation between URAA and HOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URAA vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAA
URAA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
URAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
URAA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
URAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
URAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAA vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URAAHOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.07

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

-0.39

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.11

-0.60

+0.71

URAA vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAA and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URAA vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAA drawdown since its inception was -67.45%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAA and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAAHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.45%

-86.94%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.83%

-86.94%

+27.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.80%

-77.49%

+19.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.00%

-39.28%

+11.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.03%

56.39%

-26.36%

Volatility

URAA vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) is 30.96%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 49.36%. This indicates that URAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAAHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.96%

49.36%

-18.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.07%

102.61%

-28.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.73%

139.26%

-43.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.51%

144.90%

-55.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.51%

144.90%

-55.39%

URAA vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAA has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

URAA vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

URAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.02%, less than HOOG's 25.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
25.50%12.30%0.00%
URAA
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares
12.02%9.14%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


URAA and HOOG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (49.36%) compared to URAA (30.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAA dropped -67.45% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

On 1-year performance, URAA leads with 3.39% vs -33.89% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, URAA has been the lower-risk option at 30.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, URAA has performed better with a 3.39% return vs -33.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for URAA.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 25.50%, compared with 12.02% for URAA.

URAA is categorized as Uranium, while HOOG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for URAA and 0.75% for HOOG.

URAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URAA and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer