URA vs. GNR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - URA tracks the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index while GNR tracks the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URA returned 17.12%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for GNR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.

Performance

URA vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly lower than GNR's 20.27% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has outperformed GNR with an annualized return of 17.12%, while GNR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.

URA

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 61.26%
• 3Y*: 39.27%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

GNR

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 23.12%
• 1Y: 43.10%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
URA Global X Uranium ETF	17.93%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	20.27%	28.68%	-8.27%	2.95%	10.20%	24.73%	-0.03%	16.49%	-13.19%	22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and GNR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2010	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between URA and GNR has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

URA vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URA	GNR
Energy	57.0%	37.6%
Industrials	21.9%	0.2%
Utilities	9.4%	0.0%
Basic Materials	5.0%	50.3%
Technology	0.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.6%
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

URA vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 34
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

GNR

GNR Risk / Return Rank: 82
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URA	GNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.64	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	3.38	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.46	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	5.43	-3.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	21.28	-16.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URA vs. GNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the GNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and GNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URA	GNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.64	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.48	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.50	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.26	-0.31

Drawdowns

URA vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than GNR's maximum drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and GNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	URA	GNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.54%	-51.37%	-42.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.43%	-7.97%	-20.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.81%	-21.15%	-16.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.90%	-25.66%	-12.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.45%	-48.59%	-12.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.81%	-1.51%	-41.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.01%	-14.95%	-60.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.40%	2.03%	+11.37%

Volatility

URA vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 15.94% compared to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) at 4.53%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URA	GNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.94%	4.53%	+11.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.29%	13.23%	+25.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.19%	16.39%	+33.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.62%	20.23%	+23.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.73%	21.88%	+15.85%

URA vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

URA vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than GNR's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	2.47%	2.76%	4.73%	3.37%	4.37%	3.44%	2.78%	3.84%	3.51%	2.40%	2.06%	4.59%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.14%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URA and GNR in my portfolio?

URA and GNR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URA or GNR?

URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to GNR (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs GNR's -51.37%.

Which ETF is better, URA or GNR?

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 17.12% vs 10.91% for GNR. On fees, GNR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GNR has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URA or GNR?

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 17.12% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URA or GNR?

GNR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URA or GNR?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 2.47% for GNR.

What is the main difference between URA and GNR?

URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.40% for GNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.