GNR vs. XLB
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB).
GNR and XLB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GNR is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2010. XLB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Materials Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both GNR and XLB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GNR or XLB.
Performance
GNR vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GNR achieves a -3.34% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 8.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GNR has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 4.66%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 8.42% annualized return.
GNR
-3.34%
-4.69%
-9.33%
1.96%
7.42%
4.66%
XLB
8.09%
-5.98%
-0.03%
16.20%
10.88%
8.42%
Key characteristics
| GNR | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.05 | 1.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.17 | 1.75 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.02 | 1.22 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.05 | 1.94 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.14 | 5.84 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.36% | 2.84% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.47% | 13.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.37% | -59.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.45% | -6.50% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GNR vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GNR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between GNR and XLB is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GNR vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GNR vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
GNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than XLB's 1.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 3.66% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.60% | 2.59% | 2.46% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.93% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
GNR vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GNR drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNR and XLB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GNR vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.