PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GNR vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GNR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GNR achieves a 20.90% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GNR has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 10.96%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


GNR

1D
1.34%
1M
1.31%
YTD
20.90%
6M
25.48%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
10.96%

SPY

1D
0.14%
1M
5.40%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.09%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
22.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GNR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
20.90%28.68%-8.27%2.95%10.20%24.73%-0.03%16.49%-13.19%22.64%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GNR and SPY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between GNR and SPY has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GNR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GNR
SPY

Basic Materials

50.3%
1.8%

Energy

37.6%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.8%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.9%

Industrials

0.2%
7.8%

Financial Services

0.0%
11.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.4%

Utilities

0.0%
2.4%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Technology

-

35.9%

Basic Materials

GNR
50.3%
SPY
1.8%

Energy

GNR
37.6%
SPY
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GNR
6.3%
SPY
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

GNR
4.6%
SPY
4.8%

Real Estate

GNR
0.8%
SPY
1.9%

Industrials

GNR
0.2%
SPY
7.8%

Financial Services

GNR
0.0%
SPY
11.8%

Healthcare

GNR
0.0%
SPY
8.4%

Utilities

GNR
0.0%
SPY
2.4%

Communication Services

GNR

-

SPY
11.3%

Technology

GNR

-

SPY
35.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GNR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GNR
GNR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GNR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GNRSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

2.52

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

3.42

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

3.42

+2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.57

15.93

+6.64

GNR vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GNR Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GNR and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GNRSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.52

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.84

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.87

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.59

-0.32

Drawdowns

GNR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GNR drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GNR and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GNRSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.37%

-55.19%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-8.88%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-18.76%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-24.50%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.59%

-33.72%

-14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

0.00%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.96%

-9.05%

-5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.91%

+0.12%

Volatility

GNR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.75%. This indicates that GNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GNRSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

2.75%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

8.89%

+4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

11.81%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

17.05%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

17.94%

+3.94%

GNR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GNR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GNR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

GNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than SPY's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
2.45%2.76%4.73%3.37%4.37%3.44%2.78%3.84%3.51%2.40%2.06%4.59%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.97%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GNR and SPY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GNR has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to SPY (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GNR dropped -51.37% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.57% vs 10.96% for GNR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GNR.

GNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.97% for SPY.

GNR is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GNR and 0.09% for SPY.

GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GNR and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer