URA vs. COPP
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - URA tracks the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index while COPP tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URA returned 61.26% vs 111.49% for COPP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPP.
Performance
URA vs. COPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly lower than COPP's 26.69% return.
URA
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 61.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.27%
- 5Y*
- 21.39%
- 10Y*
- 17.12%
COPP
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 22.98%
- YTD
- 26.69%
- 6M
- 39.51%
- 1Y
- 111.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA vs. COPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 17.93% | 67.18% | -1.72% |
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 26.69% | 74.02% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and COPP is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between URA and COPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
URA vs. COPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
URA
COPP
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
URA
COPP
Industrials
URA
COPP
Utilities
URA
COPP
Basic Materials
URA
COPP
Technology
URA
COPP
Communication Services
URA
-
COPP
Consumer Cyclical
URA
-
COPP
Consumer Defensive
URA
-
COPP
Financial Services
URA
-
COPP
Healthcare
URA
-
COPP
Real Estate
URA
-
COPP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. COPP — Risk / Return Rank
URA
COPP
URA vs. COPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URA | COPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 3.88 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 13.39 | -8.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URA | COPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.62 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 1.11 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
URA vs. COPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than COPP's maximum drawdown of -44.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and COPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | COPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -44.37% | -49.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.43% | -28.91% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.81% | -3.50% | -39.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.01% | -14.02% | -60.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.40% | 8.35% | +5.05% |
Volatility
URA vs. COPP - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) have volatilities of 15.94% and 15.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | COPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.94% | 15.22% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.29% | 36.30% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.19% | 42.84% | +7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.62% | 40.80% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.73% | 40.80% | -3.07% |
URA vs. COPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than COPP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
URA vs. COPP - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than COPP's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 1.87% | 2.37% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.14% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and COPP have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to COPP (15.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs COPP's -44.37%.
On 1-year performance, COPP leads with 111.49% vs 61.26% for URA. On fees, COPP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, COPP has been the lower-risk option at 15.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COPP has performed better with a 111.49% return vs 61.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 1.87% for COPP.
URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while COPP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.65% for COPP.
COPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and COPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer