UPV vs. SQQQ
UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UPV tracks the MSCI Europe Index (200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UPV returned 12.29%/yr vs -54.48%/yr for SQQQ. Their -0.60 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UPV vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -34.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UPV has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 12.29%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -54.48% annualized return.
UPV
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 41.67%
- 3Y*
- 24.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.10%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- 6M
- -32.40%
- YTD
- -34.61%
- 1Y
- -52.32%
- 3Y*
- -49.83%
- 5Y*
- -44.46%
- 10Y*
- -54.48%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.40B | $2.29B | $2.66B | |
| $55.59K | $49.44K | $105.04K |
UPV vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 15.25% | 68.63% | -4.51% | 32.16% | -36.58% | 32.38% | -3.15% | 47.04% | -32.64% | 57.44% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -34.61% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPV and SQQQ is -0.64, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010 | -0.60 |
The correlation between UPV and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.64 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
UPV vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPV
SQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UPV
SQQQ
Basic Materials
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
UPV
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPV vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
UPV
SQQQ
UPV vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.86 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | -0.81 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | -1.41 | +7.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPV vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPV drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPV and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -100.00% | +32.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | -61.03% | +37.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -92.51% | +64.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.33% | -97.27% | +38.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.25% | -99.97% | +32.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -100.00% | +99.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -92.78% | +72.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.92% | 35.08% | -28.16% |
Volatility
UPV vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) is 8.89%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 20.82%. This indicates that UPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 20.82% | -11.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.48% | 48.09% | -20.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.74% | 57.98% | -26.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 68.18% | -32.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.16% | 66.74% | -30.58% |
UPV vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPV and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UPV vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
UPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than SQQQ's 9.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.14% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 2.15% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 3.80% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPV and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (20.82%) compared to UPV (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPV dropped -67.25% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, UPV leads with 12.29% vs -54.48% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UPV has been the lower-risk option at 8.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPV has performed better with a 12.29% return vs -54.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPV and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.14%, compared with 2.15% for UPV.
UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
UPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPV and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer