PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPSD vs. DEFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPSD vs. DEFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPSD achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than DEFR's -0.13% return.


UPSD

1D
0.30%
1M
4.68%
6M
6.70%
YTD
8.09%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DEFR

1D
0.33%
1M
0.84%
6M
-0.32%
YTD
-0.13%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPSD vs. DEFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
8.09%16.35%
DEFR
Aptus Deferred Income ETF
-0.13%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UPSD and DEFR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPSD vs. DEFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPSD
UPSD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UPSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPSD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
UPSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPSD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DEFR
DEFR Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DEFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEFR Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DEFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEFR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPSD vs. DEFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPSDDEFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.17

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

2.84

+2.82

UPSD vs. DEFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the DEFR Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPSD and DEFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPSD vs. DEFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPSD drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, which is greater than DEFR's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSD and DEFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPSDDEFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.85%

-3.90%

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-3.90%

-8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.43%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-1.06%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.60%

+1.43%

Volatility

UPSD vs. DEFR - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) at 1.42%. This indicates that UPSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPSDDEFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

1.42%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

3.45%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

5.15%

+9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

5.28%

+15.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

5.28%

+15.56%

UPSD vs. DEFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UPSD and DEFR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

UPSD vs. DEFR - Dividend Comparison

UPSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while DEFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
DEFR
Aptus Deferred Income ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
0.66%0.67%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPSD and DEFR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPSD has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to DEFR (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPSD dropped -23.85% vs DEFR's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, UPSD leads with 17.13% vs 4.53% for DEFR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, DEFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UPSD has performed better with a 17.13% return vs 4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPSD and DEFR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

UPSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for DEFR.

UPSD is categorized as Actively Managed, while DEFR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond.

UPSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPSD and DEFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer