UPSD vs. DEFR
UPSD (Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF) and DEFR (Aptus Deferred Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPSD is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Aptus, while DEFR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Aptus. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UPSD returned 17.13% vs 4.53% for DEFR. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
UPSD vs. DEFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPSD achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than DEFR's -0.13% return.
UPSD
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEFR
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPSD vs. DEFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 8.09% | 16.35% |
DEFR Aptus Deferred Income ETF | -0.13% | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPSD and DEFR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPSD vs. DEFR — Risk / Return Rank
UPSD
DEFR
UPSD vs. DEFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) and Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPSD | DEFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.17 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 2.84 | +2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPSD vs. DEFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPSD drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, which is greater than DEFR's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSD and DEFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPSD | DEFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.85% | -3.90% | -19.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -3.90% | -8.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.43% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -1.06% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.60% | +1.43% |
Volatility
UPSD vs. DEFR - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF (UPSD) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) at 1.42%. This indicates that UPSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPSD | DEFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 1.42% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 3.45% | +7.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 5.15% | +9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 5.28% | +15.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 5.28% | +15.56% |
UPSD vs. DEFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPSD and DEFR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
UPSD vs. DEFR - Dividend Comparison
UPSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while DEFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DEFR Aptus Deferred Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPSD Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPSD and DEFR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPSD has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to DEFR (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPSD dropped -23.85% vs DEFR's -3.90%.
On 1-year performance, UPSD leads with 17.13% vs 4.53% for DEFR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, DEFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UPSD has performed better with a 17.13% return vs 4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPSD and DEFR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
UPSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for DEFR.
UPSD is categorized as Actively Managed, while DEFR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond.
UPSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPSD and DEFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer